Not one of these changes has made an improvement to the user experience in any imaginable way. Those guys need to stop with the skinny jeans and artisan coffee and learn to think. And it's clearly because of dev/management decisions at MS. Of course there are ways for me to deal with this, but bloody hell it's annoying. This is the boss's account, not my own account and I cannot clear the messages online and since there are enough messages that a fresh PST will continue to download tens of thousands of emails over the course of several hours until the PST hits 50gb and the program can no longer effectively deal with it. Whoever is responsible for this needs to get kicked in the teeth. This is not possible with the OWA search function. This is an acceptable manner for clearing the emails out. This happens in gmail too when you do a search, but then once you have done a "select all", another option shows up for the search button that allows you to include messages that meet the search criterion, but are not shown on that page. This account has 69,000+ messages and needs to delete around 60,000 of them. I can select these and delete them in the OWA, but *only messages that show up on the search page*, which is 75 of them. So in Gmail, there's a way to select *all* messages under a particular search criterion.įor example, "received<" will bring up messages older than a certain date.
Whoever made this change needs to get slapped in the teeth. Regardless of how I get there, either by the direct link or by using your method through the My account section via your directions, I get a 404 error. Second, the method through the My account leads to a link: Removing and hiding important features is idiotic. For everyone else, this is an important feature. Only the most useless millennial morons will never do enough work that they need to actually clean their inbox. This is intensely stupid and somebody at Microsoft needs to get slapped upside the back of the head for changing this. They have removed the settings from the outlook module.
First up, the method on this is definitely broken.
0 kommentar(er)
